Brand | Raymond Weil |
Caliber Number | RW4250, RW 4250 |
In-House? |
No |
Base Caliber |
Sellita SW260-1 or SW261-1 (see below) |
Movement Type | Automatic, self-winding mechanical |
Lignes | 11.5”’ |
Diameter |
25.6mm |
Height |
4.6mm or 5.6mm (see below) |
Jewel Count |
31 |
Beat Rate |
28,800 vph, 4 Hz |
Lift Angle |
50 degrees |
Power Reserve |
38 hours |
Rotor Style |
Ball-bearing |
Rotor Winding Direction |
Bi-directional |
Hand-Windable? |
Yes |
Anti-Shock Device |
Incabloc |
Hand Count | 3 |
Functions | Central hours; central minutes; small running seconds subdial at 6:00; date at 3:00 |
Hacking Seconds? |
Yes |
Country of Manufacture | Switzerland, Swiss made |
Known Models |
Raymond Weil Maestro Tradition, Maestro Small Seconds (Add your watch to the comments below…) |
The Raymond Weil caliber RW4250 is an automatic movement with a small seconds complication at 6:00.
This caliber is found in various RW models, including the Masetro Tradition introduced in 2010 (press-release), as well as the Maestro Small Seconds released in 2022 (press-release).
RW 4250 VS RW 4200:
The RW4250 is sometimes confused with the RW4200 – the main difference being that the RW4200 has a central seconds hand and the RW4250 has a small seconds subdial.
RW 4250 VS RW 4251:
As of this post, the current Raymond Weil models with small seconds (Millesime Collection) are powered by a caliber RW 2451 (RW4251). The main difference appears to be that the RW4251 is a no-date.
Base Caliber:
The base movement of the RW4250 appears to be a Sellita with a custom rotor.
You may see some reviewers reference the Sellita caliber SW261-1 as the base for the RW4250, but Caliber Corner thinks it is closer to the SW260-1. They are very similar movements, but the small seconds hand pinion is either higher or lower on the dial depending on the version.
The difference between the SW260-1 and SW261-1 is less than a millimeter of distance between the position of the small seconds hand. The image above may be an optical illusion caused by case and dial size (it’s based on a computer render after all). Therefore, this is unconfirmed and just a best guess based on visuals. It would not be surprising if it is in fact the SW261-1 since that movement seems to be more widely used than the SW260-1.
Of course, it doesn’t help when a watch brand is not transparent about their movement specs and the base movement used. If you have a watch with the RW4250, please check under the balance wheel and post an image if possible.
Additional Resources:
Recent Comments
L2.628.4 Master Collection with L 888.2 has open caseback. This was one of many reasons…
"If you have a 25 jewels ETA based GL224, please comment below if the caliber…
I'm not technical enough to give an informed opinion about Omegas co-axial implementation but I…
Seems that 0950 is the new version Maybe same situation with 9011 and 9051
Cap jewels "down" the train of wheels from the balance is always an upgrade in…
What does AC mean on the battery cover? Thank you
Also DUG - Deutsche Uhrenmanufaktur Glashuette. Purist Typ 1 and 2