Patek Philippe Caliber Ch 29 535 Ps Q Ch29535psq

Patek Philippe Caliber CH 29-535 PS Q

Patek Philippe Caliber Ch 29 535 Ps Q Ch29535psq

ManufacturerPatek Philippe
Caliber NumberCH 29-535 PS Q
Movement TypeMechanical, manual-wind, chronograph
Diameter
32mm
Height
7mm
Jewel Count
33 jewels
Total Parts
456
Beat Rate / Frequency
28,800 bph / 4 Hz
Lift Angle
Unconfirmed
Power Reserve
Up to 65 hours without using the chronograph
Balance Wheel
Gyromax
Balance Spring
Breguet style
Anti-Shock Device
Incabloc
Hand Count6
FunctionsCentral hours; central minutes; central chronograph seconds; small seconds at 9:00; 30 minutes chronograph counter at 3:00; pointer date subdial at 6:00; moonphase indicator at 6:00; day/night indicator at 4:30; day of the week window at 11:00; month window at 1:00; leap year indicator at 4:30
Hacking Seconds?
No
Country of ManufactureSwitzerland, Swiss made
Known Models
Patek Philippe Grand Complications (Ref: 5207J-001, 5207/1R-001, 5207P-014) (Add your watch to the comments below…)

The Patek Philippe caliber CH 29-535 PS Q is a mechanical chronograph with a triple-date perpetual calendar complication.

In Patek Philippe’s own words:

“The caliber CH 29-535 PS Q movement combines traditional design with six patented innovations and an extremely slender calendar mechanism.” –Source

Also this:

“Caliber CH 29-535 PS Q is distinguished by its traditional architecture, combined with six patented innovations relating to the chronograph, as well as by its exceptionally thin calendar mechanism.” –Source

Dial Side:

This diagram points out the location of the complications:

Patek Philippe Caliber Ch 29 535 Ps Q Dial Side

Watches with this calibre:

Additional Resources:

  • Check back for more!
Seagull Caliber St19

Join our mission to spread movement awareness!

Recent Forum Posts

Happy New Year, CC Fam!

Caliber Corner can't grow without you! Follow for new caliber listings and updates, rants, raves, and daily movement content.



Your compare list

Compare
REMOVE ALL
COMPARE
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x