Omega Cal 3861 Speedmaster 42mm 31063425001001

Omega Caliber 3861

Omega Cal 3861 Speedmaster 42mm 31063425001001

Manufacturer Omega
Caliber Number 3861
Technically no
Based On
Lemania caliber 1873
Movement Type
Mechanical, manual-wind
Yes (Omega Master Chronometer verified by METAS)
Jewels 26
Beats Per Hour
21,600 vph, 3Hz
Lift Angle
Unconfirmed (use Co-Axial compatible timing machine)
Power Reserve
50 hours
Shock Protection Nivashock
Free sprung
Balance Spring
Si14 Silicon
Yes up to 15,000 gauss
Chronograph System
Cam style
Functions Central hours; central minutes; central chronograph seconds; running seconds subdial at 9:00; 30 minutes chronograph counter at 3:00; 12 hour chrono counter at 6:00
Hacking Seconds? Yes
Rhodium plated finish or Moonshine gold plated; bridges with straight Geneva waves
Country of Manufacture Switzerland, Swiss made
Known Models
Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional Co‑Axial Master Chronometer Chronograph 42mm (Add your watch in the comments below…)

The Omega caliber 3861 is a handwound mechanical chronograph movement first introduced in the Omega Speedmaster Apollo 11 50th Anniversary watch. This caliber essentially replaces Omega’s use of the calibre 1861 and 861 be that. It is Swiss made with 27 jewels.

In Omega’s own words:

“Manual-winding chronograph movement with Co-Axial escapement. Certified Master Chronometer, approved by METAS, resistant to magnetic fields reaching 15,000 gauss. Free-sprung balance with silicon balance spring. Rhodium-plated finish, bridges with straight Geneva waves.” –source

Is the Omega 3861 an in-house movement?

The 3861 is based on the Lemania 1873, with many “upgrades” including an anti-magnetic hairspring and co-axial escapement. While Lemania was acquired by Swatch Group in 1999 via the purchase of Breguet, the in-houseness of the 3861 is up for debate due to the fact that it is overall technically based on the Lemania 1873. While some purists may not be willing to consider the 3861 as an in-house movement (designed and made by the manufacturer from the bottom up), it is quite close to being in-house as it has been modified from its original form by Omega, manufactured by Omega, and only used by Omega – which is controlled by the same watch conglomerate that also controls the company that designed the original. Short answer: the 3861 was not developed from scratch by Omega engineers. Share your thoughts on this below.

Rhodium VS Moonshine Gold:

There are two versions of the cal. 3861: one available in a silvery rhodium plated finish and the other in what Omega calls Moonshine Gold plated finish.

Disappointingly, Omega chose to allow for confusion by not giving each finish its own calibre number. Luckily, the Moonshine 3861 is not as widely available as the rhodium plated version, but if you have $36,500 to spend on a Speedy then it’s all yours (and George Clooney’s) – to be more specific, the 3861 Moonshine gold is found in the Speedmaster Anniversary Series Co‑Axial Master Chronometer Chronograph 42 mm (ref: 310.

All you other peasants must settle for a silver tone movement – even if you buy a Moonshine gold watch.

3861 VS 1861:

The 3861 is considered to be an update movement to previous Moonwatch models which were powered by the Omega caliber 1861 or 1863. The 3861 is an evolution to those as the 1861 has been discontinued. One of the main differences between the 1861 and 3861 would be the jewel count: the 1861 has 18 jewels and the 3861 has 27. The 1861 is non-hacking, whereas the 3861 has a stop seconds feature when setting the time. 3861 powered Moonwatches are the first of their kind to hack! Both calibers are about 27mm in diameter and beat at the same 21,600 bph. Although on paper, and in appearance, the two movements are similar overall, more than half of one caliber is not interchangeable with the other.

Omega 3861 Vs 1861

The gif above shows how each movement looks from the caseback view. Notice the Omega text on the 1861 is upside-down when flipping the watch over (that’s why making this video was a little tricky on the first attempt).

Omega 3861 Vs 1861 Speedmaster Compared

Editor’s observation: Clever how in the stock images of the two movements, one appears to have the chronograph engaged and one does not – giving the appearance of being more different in design than they really are. Look at the chrono reset hammer. Perhaps the brand thought themselves as being clever to produce such slight “differences”. Compare the 3861 image from the gif to the tilted movement image above.

Anti-Magnetic Properties:

It used to be that the Omega caliber 8508 got all of the credit for being resistant to magnetic fields, but now most of the newer movements such as the calibre 3861 being discussed here, are anti-magnetic up to 15,000 gauss thanks to the silicone balance spring and materials that are not affected by exposure to magnetism.

Replacement Prices:

The Omega caliber 3861 is an in-house movement and not available for individual purchase, even for Swatch Group parts accounts. At the time of this post, the retail prices of the watches this movement powers ranges from $8,300 USD to $14,000 USD.

Additional Resources:

Images credit: Omega SA – if you have better pics of the movement in your watch, please submit them here.

You are reading Caliber Corner, the world's most popular resource for watch movement pics, specs, mods and DIY repairs. Follow @calibercorner on Twitter, Instagram but NOT Facebook. Subscribe on YouTube. Join our mission to spread movement awareness!

Join the discussion on Omega Caliber 3861?

  • Keep comments respectful and follow our community guidelines.
  • Keep comments on the topic of Omega Caliber 3861

For off topic or general watch questions, post in the Caliber Corner Forum.


newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

Here I thought it was an entirely new in-house movement with a new design. Hacking is great but I don’t think it’s worth it for an extra $3-4k. So no column wheel and the watch worn on the moon was no hacking so it’s more authentic as a moon watch imo. Great article as always!

The 3861 owner
The 3861 owner
8 months ago
Reply to  Mynextwatch

The column wheel is extremely hard to manufacture. The price would definitely increase by at least 10k. Hacking is just an upgrade to the movement, I don’t think no one is complaining about that addition. The + 3k or 4K you mention goes for other refining & polishing of the movement. Not to mention inflation alone!

Anthony Al
Anthony Al
4 months ago

I got a quick question the difference between jewel counts of the 3861 and 1861 is 26 vs 18 does that mean the 1861 was not jewelled enough or was omega being cautious about wear and obtaining metas certification { a couple of them may be used in the co axial escarpment)

4 months ago

Why do you state that the calibre 3861 is not COSC certified? If you look into the Website of OMEGA they cleary state, that the movement has passed the COSC test. Apart from that, the movement has been tested by METAS separately..

3 months ago

This is an amazing movement. I set mine ten months ago and it is still within one second. I wind it daily but have not pulled the crown out in all that time. It’s worn most week days and gains about 2 second over 5 days, then loses what it has gained by being left crown down over the weekend.

2 months ago

L.A.= 38°

Seagull Caliber St19

Join our mission to spread movement awareness!

Members Online

  • keepthetime pc1093

Recent Forum Posts

Trending Comments


Sellita Caliber SW200 VS SW200-1

Wow man, you should join the R0l3X club, they're desperately looking for new members, but…


Sellita Caliber SW200 VS SW200-1

Basically you are saying that one of the world's most used workhorse movements is complete…


Slava Caliber 2427

Lum-Tec gave up trying to fix my C2 with this movement, now I'm trying to…


Seiko Instruments (SII, TMI) Caliber NH34

Hi mrdibujante, from the specs chart above: "Rotor Direction: Bi-directional (Magic Lever)" indicates that it…

Jeremiah B Leonard

ETA Caliber 955.414

I have one in Gucci watch, says Swiss. See photo….


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x